Super Cars

Call Website Contact the business

Super Cars SuperCars

The 1965 Toyota Stout, 1968 Datsun 520 Pickup, 1965 Mazda B1500, and 1965 Isuzu Wasp represent four early Japanese appro...
10/13/2026

The 1965 Toyota Stout, 1968 Datsun 520 Pickup, 1965 Mazda B1500, and 1965 Isuzu Wasp represent four early Japanese approaches to the compact work truck. All four favor relatively small engines, rear-wheel drive, manual transmissions, and practical cargo beds, but each has a different engineering identity. Toyota built the Stout around a robust, load-focused chassis; Datsun emphasized compact dimensions and economical operation; Mazda combined a small pickup body with a relatively advanced suspension layout; and Isuzu developed the Wasp as a one-tonne light commercial vehicle based on its Bellett passenger-car platform. The Toyota is the most heavy-duty-oriented concept here, the Datsun is the compact urban workhorse, the Mazda offers an interesting balance of ride and utility, and the Isuzu is the most specialized light-commercial design.

The 1965 Toyota Stout is the most work-focused truck in this comparison. The export-market Stout 1900 used a 1,897 cc (1.9-liter) 3R inline-four rated at approximately 85 hp and 110 lb-ft of torque, paired with a four-speed manual transmission. Its sturdy ladder-frame chassis, leaf-spring suspension, and four-wheel drum brakes reflect its emphasis on durability and carrying loads rather than passenger-car comfort. Toyota's second-generation Stout was designed with a flat-top hood and a more spacious cab, while the wider Stout family offered payload ratings of up to 1.75 tonnes in certain configurations. Those heavier-duty ratings should not automatically be assigned to every export-market half-ton version. The Stout is the natural choice for someone who values a tough, straightforward chassis and a reputation built around utility.

The 1968 Datsun 520 Pickup is the compact, economical alternative. Its 1,299 cc (1.3-liter) J13 overhead-valve inline-four produced approximately 67 hp and 98 Nm (72 lb-ft) of torque, driving the rear wheels through a four-speed manual transmission, commonly with column-mounted shifting. At roughly 4.25 metres long and with a curb weight around one tonne depending on specification, the Datsun was easier to maneuver in crowded streets and narrow delivery areas than the larger Stout. Its torsion-bar front suspension and semi-elliptic rear leaf springs balanced basic ride comfort with load-carrying practicality. The 520's restrained styling, compact cabin, and low-displacement engine made it a sensible small-business truck. Its main limitation today is modest power, especially when loaded or climbing steep grades, but its light weight and mechanical simplicity are central to its charm.

The 1965 Mazda B1500 uses a 1,484 cc (1.5-liter) water-cooled OHV inline-four, commonly known as the UA engine, producing approximately 72 PS (71 hp) in the revised specification introduced around October 1965. Earlier 1965 examples may have the preceding body and engine tune, so the exact build date matters. Its one-tonne-class utility design paired a conventional rear-wheel-drive layout with torsion-bar front suspension and rear leaf springs. That front suspension was relatively sophisticated for a small commercial vehicle of the period, helping the Mazda balance payload duties with a less harsh ride when unloaded. Its clean, compact proportions and slightly more car-like driving character distinguish it from the heavier Toyota. The B1500 is an appealing middle ground for someone who wants a classic Japanese pickup that remains practical in size without being as modestly powered as the Datsun.

The 1965 Isuzu Wasp is the most unusual engineering proposition of the four. Its 1,325 cc (1.3-liter) water-cooled inline-four produced around 58 hp and 96 Nm (71 lb-ft) of torque, paired with a four-speed manual gearbox. Based on the Isuzu Bellett, it used independent front suspension with torsion bars and a semi-floating rear axle with a Hotchkiss drive. Isuzu developed the Wasp as a one-tonne light commercial vehicle, and in Australia the 1965 model arrived in a very small shipment of 122 units, making surviving examples particularly uncommon there. Its modest engine output means it is better suited to light-duty hauling and local work than fast driving, but its compact layout and independent front suspension give it a distinctive place among early Japanese pickups. The Wasp's rarity and relationship to the Bellett make it especially interesting to collectors who want something beyond the better-known Toyota and Datsun nameplates.

On the road, the Mazda and Isuzu have the most car-like front suspension layouts, which can help their ride and steering feel more compliant than a truck with a conventional solid front axle. The Datsun's compact size and low weight make it well suited to narrow streets, small farms, and local deliveries, while the Toyota's more substantial chassis gives it the strongest heavy-duty orientation in this group. All four use relatively modest engines by modern standards, so loaded acceleration is limited and maintaining momentum is important. Their period drum brakes, basic steering systems, and narrow tires also mean that stopping distances and high-speed stability are very different from those of modern pickups. For a truck that will actually be driven, brake condition, suspension wear, tire age, and the engine's cooling and lubrication systems deserve more attention than small differences in original horsepower.

Their ownership and restoration prospects vary by market. The Datsun 520 benefits from Nissan's broader historical parts ecosystem, though some model-specific trim and body panels can still be difficult to find. Toyota's Stout has a straightforward mechanical layout, but unique cab and bed components may require specialist sourcing. Mazda B1500 parts availability depends heavily on the country where the truck was sold and the support of local classic Japanese vehicle clubs. The Isuzu Wasp can be the hardest to restore correctly because of its limited production and less common model-specific components. For all four, inspect the frame, cab mounts, floor pans, bed structure, wheel arches, and lower body seams for corrosion. Confirm the engine and chassis codes as well, because replacement engines, export-market variations, and later restorations can blur the original specifications.

The 1965 Toyota Stout is my pick for the strongest work-truck character, especially in its 1.9-liter export configuration. The 1968 Datsun 520 is the best compact urban pickup, with light weight and simple, economical engineering. The 1965 Mazda B1500 offers the best balance of modest power and ride sophistication, while the 1965 Isuzu Wasp is the rarest and most distinctive enthusiast choice. Choose the Toyota for rugged utility, the Datsun for compact practicality, the Mazda for a balanced classic pickup experience, or the Isuzu for rarity and unusual engineering. The best purchase, however, will be the example with the soundest chassis, the most complete original parts, and the clearest maintenance history.

Power that speaks for itself. The next generation of Dodge muscle is coming, with a bold design and pure American perfor...
10/13/2026

Power that speaks for itself. The next generation of Dodge muscle is coming, with a bold design and pure American performance. Preproduction model shown; available mid-2027.

Living the Ferrari lifestyle.Which keys are you grabbing for a weekend cruise, and what's the first song you're blasting...
10/13/2026

Living the Ferrari lifestyle.

Which keys are you grabbing for a weekend cruise, and what's the first song you're blasting once you turn the key in one of these beasts? 🎶

The Ford F-450 Super Duty, Ram 3500, GMC Sierra 3500HD and Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD are all built for serious heavy-du...
09/11/2026

The Ford F-450 Super Duty, Ram 3500, GMC Sierra 3500HD and Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD are all built for serious heavy-duty work, but the F-450 is the unusual one in this group because Ford positions it above the F-350 as a more specialized extreme-towing platform. The Ram 3500 is famous for its Cummins diesel torque, the GMC and Silverado share much of their fundamental HD mechanical architecture, while the F-450 focuses heavily on maximum towing hardware and commercial-grade capability.
The F-450's biggest advantage is that it is engineered specifically for the kind of work where a normal one-ton pickup starts reaching its limits. The 2026 Super Duty family offers the 6.7-liter Power Stroke V8 diesel and high-output version, with the F-450 available as a dual-rear-wheel truck. Ford describes the F-450 as having components aimed at extreme hauling, including a wider front axle and 19.5-inch wheels.
The Ram 3500 takes a different approach. Its available high-output 6.7-liter Cummins inline-six produces 430 horsepower and an enormous 1,075 lb-ft of torque, paired with an eight-speed TorqueFlite HD automatic. Ram lists maximum diesel towing at 36,610 lb and maximum diesel payload at 6,050 lb. That 1,075 lb-ft figure is the number that immediately separates the Ram from the rest of this particular comparison.
The GMC Sierra 3500HD uses the 6.6-liter Duramax turbo-diesel V8 with a 10-speed automatic. GMC lists up to 470 horsepower and 975 lb-ft of torque, with maximum available towing reaching 36,000 lb and maximum payload reaching 7,290 lb in the appropriate configuration. The Duramax therefore gives the GMC an excellent combination of power, torque and towing sophistication.
The Silverado 3500HD is mechanically very close to the Sierra because both come from the same GM HD architecture. The Duramax/10-speed combination gives the Chevrolet the same fundamental heavy-duty character, while the Silverado generally has a more work-oriented identity than the upscale Sierra. If you compare equivalent configurations, the decision between these two is much more about trim, cabin design, equipment and intended use than about basic diesel capability.
The biggest raw-torque winner is the Ram. Its 1,075 lb-ft gives it an enormous low-speed pulling reserve, particularly useful when starting heavy trailers, climbing grades and maintaining speed under load. The Duramax's 975 lb-ft is also immense, but the Ram still has a 100 lb-ft advantage on paper.
The F-450 is interesting because Ford does not need to win the torque-number contest to make it the more specialized towing machine. Its wider front axle, larger wheels and chassis configuration are intended to provide stability and durability when the truck is operating with substantial loads. Ford's 2026 documentation shows the F-450 DRW reaching 30,000 lb in certain conventional-towing configurations, while Ford's Super Duty range offers up to 40,000 lb of gooseneck towing in properly equipped configurations.
That distinction is important because "maximum towing capacity" is not one universal number. A truck's cab, bed, axle ratio, drivetrain, tires, engine, hitch type, payload and trailer configuration can change the rating substantially. For example, GMC lists the Sierra 3500HD at up to 36,000 lb of gooseneck/fifth-wheel towing in a particular configuration, while other configurations have lower limits.
For enormous fifth-wheel or gooseneck trailers, the F-450 makes an especially strong argument. The dual rear wheels provide greater rear-axle stability and the F-450's specialized hardware is designed around extreme towing. Ford itself notes that the F-450 generally offers greater towing capacity than the F-350, particularly for gooseneck and fifth-wheel work.
The Ram 3500 is arguably the most compelling truck if your priority is the feeling of effortless diesel torque. The Cummins inline-six has a very different character from the Ford and GM V8 diesels. It develops its enormous torque without needing a high-revving personality, making the truck feel extremely relaxed when pulling a heavy trailer.
The GMC's Duramax V8 takes a more refined approach. Its 10-speed transmission provides close gear spacing, helping the engine stay in a useful operating range as load and terrain change. GMC also provides an exhaust brake and extensive camera/trailer technology, making the Sierra particularly attractive for long-distance towing.
The Silverado benefits from essentially the same Duramax powertrain technology, so it remains one of the strongest choices when the truck's primary mission is work. You get serious diesel torque, a 10-speed transmission and a very substantial towing platform without needing to move into the more luxurious GMC trim philosophy.
The F-450 has a different kind of authority. It feels less like a luxury pickup that happens to tow enormous trailers and more like a heavy-duty machine that has been adapted into a pickup format. Its DRW configuration, larger wheels and wider front axle are clues to its intended environment.
Payload creates an interesting result. The Ram's maximum diesel payload is listed at 6,050 lb, while GMC advertises up to 7,290 lb for the Sierra 3500HD in its highest-rated configuration. Ford lists up to 6,952 lb of diesel payload across the Super Duty range, although the exact F-450 figure depends on configuration. Therefore, the truck with the biggest towing number is not automatically the truck with the biggest payload.
For daily driving, the Ram 3500 and GMC Sierra 3500HD can be easier choices than the F-450 DRW. The F-450's dual rear wheels and larger 19.5-inch tires are excellent for heavy work but make the truck physically wider and less convenient in parking lots and narrow roads.
The Sierra has perhaps the strongest luxury argument. In upper trims, the cabin can feel remarkably upscale for a truck capable of towing tens of thousands of pounds. GMC's camera and trailering systems are also designed to reduce the workload of positioning and monitoring a large trailer.
The Silverado is the more straightforward choice within the GM family. It makes particular sense when the truck is going to spend its life hauling equipment, towing trailers, carrying materials or working around farms and construction sites. Its shared Duramax hardware means it does not give up the fundamental mechanical capability of the Sierra simply because the Chevrolet has a more work-oriented personality.
The Ram combines work capability with a strong premium-truck identity in higher trims. Its Cummins engine is the major attraction, and the available automatic exhaust brake, heavy-duty braking system and trailer-focused technology make it a very serious long-distance towing machine.
If I separate them by mission, the F-450 is the extreme-duty towing specialist. The Ram 3500 is the torque monster. The GMC Sierra 3500HD is the premium heavy-duty all-rounder. The Silverado 3500HD is the work-focused GM alternative with essentially the same fundamental Duramax HD capability as the GMC.
For maximum diesel torque, I would choose the Ram 3500. Its 1,075 lb-ft is simply enormous.
For the most specialized heavy-duty towing platform, I would choose the Ford F-450 Super Duty. Its DRW configuration, wider front axle and 19.5-inch wheels make it particularly well suited to extreme hauling.
For a combination of serious towing capability, luxury and technology, the GMC Sierra 3500HD is probably the most attractive overall package. GMC's maximum figures reach 36,000 lb towing and 7,290 lb payload in appropriate configurations.
For a durable, powerful and more straightforward workhorse, the Silverado 3500HD is the logical choice.
Overall, I would rank them differently depending on the job: F-450 for extreme commercial towing, Ram 3500 for diesel torque and heavy-hauling character, Sierra 3500HD for luxury plus towing, and Silverado 3500HD for practical work use. There is no universal winner because these trucks are engineered around different versions of the same fundamental mission: moving very heavy things reliably.

Lamborghini Vs Ferrari 💛💛
02/02/2025

Lamborghini Vs Ferrari 💛💛











  RS6 🖤😬🔥
02/02/2025

RS6 🖤😬🔥

Porsche 992 GT3 RS 🌬️
02/02/2025

Porsche 992 GT3 RS 🌬️

Aston Martin
02/02/2025

Aston Martin

  RSQ8 🖤🔥
01/30/2025

RSQ8 🖤🔥

█ 🟢█ ⚪️█ 🔴████ 𝗔𝗠𝗕𝗢𝗥𝗚𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗜 𝗛𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗡
01/30/2025

█ 🟢
█ ⚪️
█ 🔴
████ 𝗔𝗠𝗕𝗢𝗥𝗚𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗜 𝗛𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗡

Address

2763 Redbud Drive
New York, NY
11357

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Super Cars posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Super Cars:

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Nearby autos & automotive services